MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of David Poljak [896th] vs Marek Rehacek [] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-2-Head: Poljak 0 - 0 Rehacek

Poljak vs Rehacek H2H Profile
Poljak Stats Rehacek
69% (18-8) YTD Win/Loss 50% (1-1)
0 Head-to-Head 0
896 Ranking N/A
370 Highest Rank
28 Age 29
R Plays -
6 Titles 0
55% (339-277) Career Total W/L 54% (45-38)
$0 Career Prize Money $0
0 YTD Titles 0
0 Hard H2H 0
0 Clay H2H 0
0 Indoor H2H 0
0 Grass H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Poljak VS Rehacek H2H Matches played

No H2H Matches Available

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

David Poljak vs Marek Rehacek Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Poljak 0 - 0 Rehacek

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Poljak has won 43.11% of points on their second serve, while Rehacek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Poljak, in recent form, has won 43.36% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rehacek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.21% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Poljak has saved 58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rehacek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Poljak has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 32/ 20), with Rehacek winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Poljak has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 111/ 75), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 109/ 112). Rehacek has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
  • Player level: In the last year, Poljak has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.31% of matches (W/L 32/ 17), where as Rehacek has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Poljak has played against opponents with an average rank of 238.5 while Rehacek has played against players with an average rank of 447.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Poljak has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rehacek has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Poljak has converted 34.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rehacek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • David Poljak Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R1
    cross
    Cem Ilkel
    Player
    David Poljak
    61% ( 62 of 101)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 68 of 110)
    9
    Aces
    7
    0
    Double Faults
    3
    74% ( 46 of 62)
    1st Serve Won
    69% ( 47 of 68)
    64% ( 25 of 39)
    2nd Serve Won
    52% ( 22 of 42)
    33% ( 3 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    30% ( 30 of 101)
    Rtn Points Won
    37% ( 41 of 110)
    112
    Total Points Won
    99
    L
    6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 H2H
    QF
    cross
    David Poljak
    Player
    Gabriele Volpi
    67% ( 54 of 81)
    1st Serve %
    68% ( 56 of 82)
    8
    Aces
    7
    3
    Double Faults
    1
    76% ( 41 of 54)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 39 of 56)
    52% ( 14 of 27)
    2nd Serve Won
    58% ( 15 of 26)
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    32% ( 26 of 81)
    Rtn Points Won
    34% ( 28 of 82)
    83
    Total Points Won
    80
    W
    6-7(2) 6-4 10-8 H2H
    Q2
    cross
    David Poljak
    Player
    Samuel Stolarik
    54% ( 19 of 35)
    1st Serve %
    45% ( 15 of 33)
    5
    Aces
    1
    0
    Double Faults
    3
    74% ( 14 of 19)
    1st Serve Won
    47% ( 7 of 15)
    88% ( 14 of 16)
    2nd Serve Won
    28% ( 5 of 18)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    20% ( 7 of 35)
    Rtn Points Won
    64% ( 21 of 33)
    49
    Total Points Won
    19
    W
    6-0 6-1 H2H
    Q1
    W
    6-1 6-3 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Egor Gerasimov
    Player
    David Poljak
    69% ( 70 of 101)
    1st Serve %
    61% ( 63 of 103)
    7
    Aces
    3
    5
    Double Faults
    2
    76% ( 53 of 70)
    1st Serve Won
    71% ( 45 of 63)
    39% ( 12 of 31)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 19 of 40)
    33% ( 4 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 3 of 9)
    36% ( 36 of 101)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 39 of 103)
    104
    Total Points Won
    100
    L
    5-7 6-4 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    David Poljak
    Player
    Simon Reveniau
    69% ( 45 of 65)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 26 of 41)
    7
    Aces
    3
    0
    Double Faults
    4
    71% ( 32 of 45)
    1st Serve Won
    73% ( 19 of 26)
    35% ( 7 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    47% ( 7 of 15)
    67% ( 2 of 3)
    Break Points Won
    17% ( 1 of 6)
    40% ( 26 of 65)
    Rtn Points Won
    37% ( 15 of 41)
    54
    Total Points Won
    52
    W
    6-3 6-7(11) 6-1 H2H
    QF
    cross
    David Poljak
    Player
    Louis Larue
    67% ( 32 of 48)
    1st Serve %
    75% ( 33 of 44)
    5
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    75% ( 24 of 32)
    1st Serve Won
    36% ( 12 of 33)
    56% ( 9 of 16)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 5 of 11)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    31% ( 15 of 48)
    Rtn Points Won
    61% ( 27 of 44)
    60
    Total Points Won
    32
    W
    6-1 6-1 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    David Poljak
    Player
    Arthur Laborde
    62% ( 44 of 71)
    1st Serve %
    60% ( 40 of 67)
    4
    Aces
    3
    3
    Double Faults
    4
    75% ( 33 of 44)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 28 of 40)
    56% ( 15 of 27)
    2nd Serve Won
    52% ( 14 of 27)
    50% ( 2 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    17% ( 1 of 6)
    32% ( 23 of 71)
    Rtn Points Won
    37% ( 25 of 67)
    73
    Total Points Won
    65
    W
    7-6(4) 6-3 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    William Jucha
    Player
    David Poljak
    65% ( 31 of 48)
    1st Serve %
    75% ( 18 of 24)
    4
    Aces
    5
    2
    Double Faults
    1
    68% ( 21 of 31)
    1st Serve Won
    89% ( 16 of 18)
    29% ( 5 of 17)
    2nd Serve Won
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    Break Points Won
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    46% ( 22 of 48)
    Rtn Points Won
    17% ( 4 of 24)
    30
    Total Points Won
    42
    L
    3-6 6-4 10-7 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Jonas Schaer
    Player
    David Poljak
    62% ( 48 of 78)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 53 of 80)
    2
    Aces
    10
    5
    Double Faults
    2
    69% ( 33 of 48)
    1st Serve Won
    75% ( 40 of 53)
    57% ( 17 of 30)
    2nd Serve Won
    30% ( 8 of 27)
    33% ( 3 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    67% ( 2 of 3)
    36% ( 28 of 78)
    Rtn Points Won
    40% ( 32 of 80)
    82
    Total Points Won
    76
    L
    6-7(3) 6-3 10-8 H2H

    Marek Rehacek Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    Q2
    L
    6-4 6-4 H2H
    Q1
    W
    6-2 2-6 10-6 H2H
    R1
    L
    6-0 6-4 H2H
    R1
    L
    4-6 6-2 6-0 H2H
    R1
    L
    6-0 7-5 H2H
    R1
    L
    5-7 6-4 7-5 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Petr Nouza
    Player
    Marek Rehacek
    55% ( 30 of 55)
    1st Serve %
    54% ( 36 of 67)
    13
    Aces
    6
    4
    Double Faults
    7
    83% ( 25 of 30)
    1st Serve Won
    75% ( 27 of 36)
    64% ( 16 of 25)
    2nd Serve Won
    32% ( 10 of 31)
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    25% ( 14 of 55)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 30 of 67)
    71
    Total Points Won
    51
    L
    6-2 7-5 H2H
    Q1
    W
    7-6(4) 7-5 H2H
    QF
    W
    7-5 6-2 H2H
    Q1
    L
    6-1 6-1 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Poljak & Rehacek Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    David Poljak Poljak Stats Marek Rehacek Rehacek
    55% (339/277) Win/Loss 54% (45/38)
    54% (772/660) Sets Win/Loss 54% (99/86)
    52% (7082/6591) Games Win/Loss 52% (879/796)
    0.39 Aces Per Game 0.05
    2608 Aces Total 38
    0.24 Double Faults Per Game 0.06
    1604 Total Double Faults 53
    1:23:9 Average Match Time 1st Match
    514.34 Average Opponent Rank 265.35
    60% (22053/36955) 1st Serve % 61% (588/961)
    70% (15460/22053) 1st Serve Win % 64% (377/588)
    49% (7229/14901) 2nd Serve Win % 46% (172/373)
    43% (1498/3447) Break Points Won % (Total) 35% (28/80)
    39% (14194/36182) Return Points Win % 37% (359/979)
    55% (334/610) Best of 3 Sets Win % 54% (43/80)
    100% (1/1) Best of 5 Sets Win % 100% (2/2)
    51% (98/191) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 29% (5/17)
    51% (105/205) Deciding Set Win % 50% (9/18)
    83% (336/280) 1st Set Won, Won Match 85% (48/41)
    17% (336/56) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 15% (48/7)
    20% (280/57) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 11% (35/4)

    Other Predictions

    Rome Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...